Archive | July, 2009

British Columbia Industry Paying the Price for Tar Sands

28 Jul

Photos

KitsBeachMay09 050

KitsBeachMay09 050

see larger image

uploaded by amorey

<!– –>

British Columbia has positioned itself as a leader in tackling global warming. Yet the province’s natural environment and climate leadership are being threatened from beyond its borders by the federal government’s desire for unrestrained growth in Alberta’s Tar Sands.

<!– –>

According to a mail out from Forest Ethics:

<!– –>

INDUSTRIES ACROSS CANADA WILL BE FORCED TO CUT UP TO 96 MILLION TONNES OF EMISSIONS IF TAR SANDS PROTECTED IN FEDERAL CLIMATE POLICY

Premier Campbell called on to defend B.C.’s interests at upcoming Council of the Federation

Vancouver – B.C. industries, such as pulp, paper and oil and gas, would be forced to reduce their carbon emissions beyond their fair share if the federal government protects tar sands expansion in its impending federal climate policy, according to a new report released today by environmental group ForestEthics, “TARnishing our Climate Effort: Dirty Oil and the Future of B.C.”  The group is calling on Premier Campbell to defend British Columbia’s climate leadership at the upcoming Council of the Federation meeting in Regina (August 5-7) and not accept a free pass for the Tar Sands.

B.C. has a legally-binding target to reduce emissions by 33% below the 2007 level by 2020 and many businesses are already doing their part to reach the national goal. Tar sands emissions are projected to grow from 35 million tonnes in 2007 to 108 million tonnes by 2020 – nearly a tripling in emissions even while other industries are reducing their output.
 
“Premier Campbell needs to ensure Ottawa doesn’t make a special deal for the tar sands because that will hurt B.C.’s economy and environment,” said Merran Smith, Climate Director, ForestEthics.  “We’re asking Premier Campbell to defend B.C.’s businesses through his continued climate leadership and a strong voice for fairness next week in Regina,”

Even with the existing weak federal emissions targets, more than 80 million tonnes would have to be cut from elsewhere in the Canadian economy to protect the tar sands right to pollute. If Canada adopts a target that is consistent with what scientists say is required, 96 million tonnes would have to be cut elsewhere, according to ForestEthics’ new report.

Ontario’s Premier McGuinty has already voiced a desire for a fair national cap and trade system. As Canada’s fourth largest provincial economy, British Columbia has yet to weigh in.

The report also shows B.C. is actually helping tar sands expand by sending tar sands oil to Asia from Vancouver via Kinder Morgan’s TMX pipeline. The federal government is also deciding whether or not to approve a new pipeline, called Northern Gateway, from Alberta to Kitimat that would send enough tar sands oil to Asia and the U.S. to fill more than 26,000 Olympic swimming pools annually.

ForestEthics will be raising awareness of tar sands’ threats to BC in Vancouver and the north, urging members and the public to send a message to the Premier.

<!– –>

Tags: | | | | | | | | |

Advertisements

British Columbia Industry Paying the Price for Tar Sands

28 Jul
<!– –>

British Columbia has positioned itself as a leader in tackling global warming. Yet the province’s natural environment and climate leadership are being threatened from beyond its borders by the federal government’s desire for unrestrained growth in Alberta’s Tar Sands.

<!– –>

According to a mail out from Forest Ethics:

<!– –>

INDUSTRIES ACROSS CANADA WILL BE FORCED TO CUT UP TO 96 MILLION TONNES OF EMISSIONS IF TAR SANDS PROTECTED IN FEDERAL CLIMATE POLICY

Premier Campbell called on to defend B.C.’s interests at upcoming Council of the Federation

Vancouver – B.C. industries, such as pulp, paper and oil and gas, would be forced to reduce their carbon emissions beyond their fair share if the federal government protects tar sands expansion in its impending federal climate policy, according to a new report released today by environmental group ForestEthics, “TARnishing our Climate Effort: Dirty Oil and the Future of B.C.”  The group is calling on Premier Campbell to defend British Columbia’s climate leadership at the upcoming Council of the Federation meeting in Regina (August 5-7) and not accept a free pass for the Tar Sands.

B.C. has a legally-binding target to reduce emissions by 33% below the 2007 level by 2020 and many businesses are already doing their part to reach the national goal. Tar sands emissions are projected to grow from 35 million tonnes in 2007 to 108 million tonnes by 2020 – nearly a tripling in emissions even while other industries are reducing their output.
 
“Premier Campbell needs to ensure Ottawa doesn’t make a special deal for the tar sands because that will hurt B.C.’s economy and environment,” said Merran Smith, Climate Director, ForestEthics.  “We’re asking Premier Campbell to defend B.C.’s businesses through his continued climate leadership and a strong voice for fairness next week in Regina,”

Even with the existing weak federal emissions targets, more than 80 million tonnes would have to be cut from elsewhere in the Canadian economy to protect the tar sands right to pollute. If Canada adopts a target that is consistent with what scientists say is required, 96 million tonnes would have to be cut elsewhere, according to ForestEthics’ new report.

Ontario’s Premier McGuinty has already voiced a desire for a fair national cap and trade system. As Canada’s fourth largest provincial economy, British Columbia has yet to weigh in.

The report also shows B.C. is actually helping tar sands expand by sending tar sands oil to Asia from Vancouver via Kinder Morgan’s TMX pipeline. The federal government is also deciding whether or not to approve a new pipeline, called Northern Gateway, from Alberta to Kitimat that would send enough tar sands oil to Asia and the U.S. to fill more than 26,000 Olympic swimming pools annually.

ForestEthics will be raising awareness of tar sands’ threats to BC in Vancouver and the north, urging members and the public to send a message to the Premier.

<!– –>

Tags: | | | | | | | | |

British Columbia Industry Paying the Price for Tar Sands

28 Jul
<!– –>

British Columbia has positioned itself as a leader in tackling global warming. Yet the province’s natural environment and climate leadership are being threatened from beyond its borders by the federal government’s desire for unrestrained growth in Alberta’s Tar Sands.

<!– –>

According to a mail out from Forest Ethics:

<!– –>

INDUSTRIES ACROSS CANADA WILL BE FORCED TO CUT UP TO 96 MILLION TONNES OF EMISSIONS IF TAR SANDS PROTECTED IN FEDERAL CLIMATE POLICY

Premier Campbell called on to defend B.C.’s interests at upcoming Council of the Federation

Vancouver – B.C. industries, such as pulp, paper and oil and gas, would be forced to reduce their carbon emissions beyond their fair share if the federal government protects tar sands expansion in its impending federal climate policy, according to a new report released today by environmental group ForestEthics, “TARnishing our Climate Effort: Dirty Oil and the Future of B.C.”  The group is calling on Premier Campbell to defend British Columbia’s climate leadership at the upcoming Council of the Federation meeting in Regina (August 5-7) and not accept a free pass for the Tar Sands.

B.C. has a legally-binding target to reduce emissions by 33% below the 2007 level by 2020 and many businesses are already doing their part to reach the national goal. Tar sands emissions are projected to grow from 35 million tonnes in 2007 to 108 million tonnes by 2020 – nearly a tripling in emissions even while other industries are reducing their output.
 
“Premier Campbell needs to ensure Ottawa doesn’t make a special deal for the tar sands because that will hurt B.C.’s economy and environment,” said Merran Smith, Climate Director, ForestEthics.  “We’re asking Premier Campbell to defend B.C.’s businesses through his continued climate leadership and a strong voice for fairness next week in Regina,”

Even with the existing weak federal emissions targets, more than 80 million tonnes would have to be cut from elsewhere in the Canadian economy to protect the tar sands right to pollute. If Canada adopts a target that is consistent with what scientists say is required, 96 million tonnes would have to be cut elsewhere, according to ForestEthics’ new report.

Ontario’s Premier McGuinty has already voiced a desire for a fair national cap and trade system. As Canada’s fourth largest provincial economy, British Columbia has yet to weigh in.

The report also shows B.C. is actually helping tar sands expand by sending tar sands oil to Asia from Vancouver via Kinder Morgan’s TMX pipeline. The federal government is also deciding whether or not to approve a new pipeline, called Northern Gateway, from Alberta to Kitimat that would send enough tar sands oil to Asia and the U.S. to fill more than 26,000 Olympic swimming pools annually.

ForestEthics will be raising awareness of tar sands’ threats to BC in Vancouver and the north, urging members and the public to send a message to the Premier.

<!– –>

Tags: | | | | | | | | |

Obama looks to Monsanto ally to oversee food safety

24 Jul

Videos

No footage found.

This is an alarming development for anyone who has a serious interest in food safety in America.

<!– –>

The person who may be responsible for more food-related illness and death than anyone in history has just been made the US food safety czar. This is no joke.

<!– –>

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Washington Post cancels pay-to-play meetings at CEO home

2 Jul

The Washington Post has cancelled a controversial plan to host a series of off the record ‘salons’ at the company CEO’s home after word got out that sponsors can buy access to the meetings for 25 grand a pop.  This is yet another blow to the credibility of mainstream news.

Washington Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth today canceled plans for a series of policy dinners at her home after learning that marketing fliers offered lobbyists access to Obama administration officials, members of Congress and Post journalists in exchange for payments as high as $250,000.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |